In any case, format will sit deservedly on the smallest death in Ireland in That By the time Schapiro returned to signposts are always welcome. It is York, and while he had maintained an course, a sub-text to all this, easily visible rare that images can speak so strongly interest in Romanesque sculpture in the in the introductory acknowledgements, in when reproduced, but this is one of those intervening 35 years his main preoccupa- the form of the wealth of contemporary exceptional cases.
And here is a message tion had turned towards modern art and and posthumous pre-existing discourse for British Hopper aficionados familiar art theory. In particular he seems to have and criticism about Hopper. It is unusual to produce a summation that he would later of equal importance. It is published to find a publication so competitively priced, work up for publication.
At the same time, its magnificent Unreservedly recommended. Here are oils, others. This important figure in the field, but his value The book then moves on to the use of was certainly a wise move, since the book to those who respect him is mainly as a camouflage for hunting, and to the provides a glimpse of a moment of corrective: to a too-rigid iconographic remarkably recent history of its use for excitement in the history of art, rather analysis based on over-reliance on texts, military purposes.
Until the twentieth than the record of 30 years of tinkering on and to an assumption that sculpture, century, armies still wore uniforms of a doomed project.
It made them visible over The ideas contained in the arts, derived its imagery and ideas from long distances, displayed their strength to lectures were little more than an expanded those of a higher status.
This is the the enemy and gave troops a sense of restatement of those expressed in Scha- problem, of course, and the reason why identity and camaraderie. Those who and red trousers when they went to war in adventurous times. Porter himself was cisely what Schapiro worked to subvert. Please try again! How was the reading experience on this article? The text was blurry Page doesn't load Other:. Details Include any more information that will help us locate the issue and fix it faster for you.
Thank you for submitting a report! Submitting a report will send us an email through our customer support system. Submit report Close. The only other figure one can think of who focused so systematically on the formal qualities and expressive Journal Common Knowledge — Duke University Press Published: Apr 1, Recommended Articles Loading There are no references for this article.
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals. Already have an account? Log in. APA Hamburger, J. This volume is as valuable for its presentation of Schapiro's Norton Lectures as it is for Linda Seidel's comprehensive and thought-provoking introduction. Here the reader is given a thorough background to the lectures, emphasizing the relationship between Schapiro and Arthur Kingsley Porter which appears to have been the motivation behind the choice of themes for the lectures.
Seidel also situates Schapiro within or rather against the intellectual milieu of mid-century art history, thereby setting the reader up to understand the significance of Schapiro's point of view. Although the lectures had been reworked by Schapiro for publication albeit unsuccessfully , Seidel's decision to return and rigorously adhere to the original presentation is wholly justified, documenting not only Schapiro's candid style of presentation, but also the process and progress of the lectures themselves.
The result is a text that is fresh and direct, even with its inherent grammatical problem of trying to punctuate free-flowing speech. The greatest challenge appears to have been illustrating the seven, hour-long lectures each one of which is a meticulous descriptive analysis of numerous works of art. Nevertheless, the reader is made to feel as if they were, as Seidel herself was, a member of the audience in Memorial Hall. The chapter breakdown of the volume follows the themes of the seven lectures as originally presented: the rebirth of monumental sculpture in the west; the relationship of field, figure and frame two chapters ; programs of imagery two chapters ; the human figure; and animal imagery.
In his discussions, Schapiro enlivened what in the hands of a lesser scholar might have been a pointless discussion of the formal characteristics of Romanesque sculpture into a rich and rewarding lesson in seeing. His keen eye and mind had the ability to make minute observations on style and, at the same time, intuitive comparisons on a grand scale.
Speaking at a time when most scholars of medieval art were still interested in such questions as dating and origins, Schapiro challenged these methodologies, focusing his own observations instead on the consideration of human agency - the innovative and creative contributions of the Romanesque carver and the inherent complexity of their work. As noted by Seidel in the introduction, he "sought to define underlying principles by which medieval images are constructed and through which they represent human activity and communicate intellectual and emotional content" xii.
0コメント